[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

* Erik Bais

>> I also note that the Impact Analysis warns that this policy may
>> lead to increased fees for members, which would be an undesirable
>> consequence. I don't feel that the members should be sponsoring the
>> non-members; equal access to addresses from the last /8 should mean
>> equal monetary contribution to the NCC.
> 
> Does that mean that you want the sponsored PI assignments get the
> same cost as a direct assignment (1300 euro yearly maintenance per
> object) ?

Yes, something along those lines would be good.

BTW: This would, as I understand it, be in the same ballpark as what you
would have to pay if you want a PI assignment from APNIC's last /8.

> Snip from your email:
> 
>> In principle, I support this proposal.
> 
>> (Just to be clear: I am not stating neither support or opposition
>> to the proposal.)
> 
> Which one is it?

Neither. I haven't made up my mind yet, so I'm thinking out loud...

-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com