This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon Sep 10 17:02:08 CEST 2012
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:30:10PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >> i can not speak to the intent in the ripe region. but the principal >> intent of the final /8 policy in the apnic region was so that *new* >> entrants could get one small piece of the pie. > >This was also the original reasoning here in the RIPE region. If so, the letter of the policy contradicts this - there is no mention of only "new" requestors, rather any LIR that can demonstrate a need will be assigned one last /22. One could reasonably assume that the intention has then failed in the original policy and is not a valid argument against the proposal... rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]