[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

Gert,

My apoligies - it is a +1 on Randy's email. Lets reserve the last few ipv4 addresses for those who come
in the future and not blow through them quickly. So I do not support the change in policy.

Jasper

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:12 PM
To: Jasper Jans
Cc: Randy Bush; Erik Bais; Nick Hilliard (nick at inex.ie); address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:00:36PM +0200, Jasper Jans wrote:
> +1

Does that mean "I support the policy proposal 2012-04" or "I agree with Randy about the original intent of the last-/8-Policy" or "I oppose 2012-04"?

A *few* more words save lots of extra questions.

(I took Randy's e-mail as explanation about the last /8 policy, and not voicing a particular opinion on 2012-04.  Correct me if that was not right)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op
http://www.esprittelecom.nl/disclaimer/html