[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:54:59PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > <provoking>I don't see how anyone can be against this proposal.</provoking>
> 
> I don't see the real world benefit of the proposal, there are insufficient
> arguments for it, and I'm therefore with Tore on this one.
> 
> (So now you perhaps see how anyone _can_ be against it.)

Uh.  Can you please be a bit more explicit, as not everybody might remember
Tore's stance on this?

I take it that you are opposing the proposal?  Any variant of the proposal,
or would you support the "publish, but anonymize rejected transfers" option?

It's a bit hard for the chairs to figure out which way to go if opinions
are not stated clearly...

thanks,

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279