[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)

Agree with Tore Anderson here. Much as I would love to discuss modification of other aspects of the transfer policy, and as important as the questions raised by Wilfried are, they are not germane to 2012-5 at all. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tore Anderson [mailto:tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com]
> > Thus, when there is a proposal to amend existing policy text, this
> > might be a good point in time to have a look at the whole set of
> provisions.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> > "
> > LIRs that receive a re-allocation from another LIR cannot re-allocate
> > complete or partial blocks of the same address space to another LIR
> > within 24 months of receiving the re-allocation.
> > "
> 
> > "
> > The block that is to be re-allocated must not be smaller than the
> > minimum allocation block size at the time of re-allocation.
> > "
> 
> Your questions are off topic, as both of those sentences you quoated are
> not modified in any way by 2012-05.
> 
> You are of course free to start a new discussion about them, submit a
> new proposal to change them, and so forth. But please, don't hijack the
> 2012-05 thread.
> 
> --
> Tore Anderson
> Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com