This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Sep 3 12:28:59 CEST 2012
Hello Working Group, Looking at the feedback I see two types of responses: - The policy proposal is good as it is - Information on rejected transfer should be anonymised We could suggest to the proposer to add the 'anonymise rejected transfers' bit to the proposal, but we are not sure if that would gain support on one side while losing support from people who like the policy proposal as it currently is... So... Again your feedback please! Is there anyone who thinks that anonymising details of rejected transfers is a bad idea? (and if so: please explain why) Thank you, Sander Steffann APWG Co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]