[address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')

I support both the proposal and the suggestion on fast-tracking.

+1

/Ragnar




On 30.10.12 16:31, "Tore Anderson" <tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com>
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I invite everyone that supports this proposal to publicly say so by
>posting a message to the list, so that the proposal will hopefully be
>fast-tracked by the WG chairs.
>
>* Emilio Madaio
>
>> The draft document for the version 2.0 of the policy proposal
>> 2010-06,"Revert 'Run Out Fairly'" has been published. The impact
>> analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been
>> published.
>
>I have a small nit to pick with the impact analysis, which says:
>
>  The allocation and assignment periods will no longer be three months.
>    Said periods will become:
>    [...]
>    - For assignments: 24 months.
>
>That is not what the proposal says. It makes no mention of 24 months
>anywhere. What it does say, is:
>
>  Assignments¹ immediate utilisation should be at least 25% of the
>  assigned space. After one year, this should be at least 50% of the
>  space unless special circumstances are defined.
>
>Therefore, if the end user's usage is increasing exponentially over
>time, his maximum assignment period will be less than 24 months.
>
>On the other hand, if the end user's usage is increasing at a slower and
>slower pace over time, his maximum assignment period will be longer than
>24 months.
>
>In any case, the text in question is the exact same as it used to be
>before Run Out Fairly was implemented.
>
>Best regards,
>-- 
>Tore Anderson
>Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
>