This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012101501001508] [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
presiden at ukraine.su
Fri Oct 19 02:31:19 CEST 2012
I agree with Sergey. Sponsoring LIR can't do anything with PI net, i.e. this publication can't help to stop spam from this net, for example. But it can get harm to the business as shows the link to clients, number of it, rough income, etc. Maybe it is good for EU, but definitely NOT good for ex-USSR countries. On 15. 10. 2012, at 20:45, Sergey Myasoedov <sergey at devnull.ru> wrote: > > I also disagree with the statement 'detect and react'. Sponsoring LIR is not responsible > for the PI network and often does not provide any kind of IP connectivity. > > There is an existence of valid PI contacts listed as one of criteria for PI assignment. > And this is enough. > > > > Monday, October 15, 2012, 5:27:26 PM, you wrote: > > SL> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:23:56PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: >>> This could help curb, or at least detect and react to, abuse once IPv4 >>> PI is hopefully allowed once again. > SL> That is exactly why I strongly oppose this proposal. Publishing the > SL> sponsoring LIR for a PI assignment creates an appearance of > SL> responsibility on the part of the sposoring LIR, for the actions of the > SL> PI assignee, *that does not exist*. > > > > -- > Sergey > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012101501001508] [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FW: [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]