[address-policy-wg] [ncc-services-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)

I also disagree with the statement 'detect and react'. Sponsoring LIR is not responsible
for the PI network and often does not provide any kind of IP connectivity.

There is an existence of valid PI contacts listed as one of criteria for PI assignment.
And this is enough.



Monday, October 15, 2012, 5:27:26 PM, you wrote:

SL> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 04:23:56PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>>This could help curb, or at least detect and react to, abuse once IPv4
>>PI is hopefully allowed once again.
SL> That is exactly why I strongly oppose this proposal. Publishing the
SL> sponsoring LIR for a PI assignment creates an appearance of
SL> responsibility on the part of the sposoring LIR, for the actions of the
SL> PI assignee, *that does not exist*.



--
Sergey