[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:27:48PM +0200, Wilfried Woeber wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > There are traces of needs-based still present in the system
> 
> AFAIK RFC2050 still is in effect.
> 
> All more recent suggestions to get it modified or retired were not successful.
> 
> I got to understand that messing around with it [c|w]ould have far-reaching
> unwanted consequences for the whole IP Address Distribution System.

Like we have Addresses to Distribute :-) - the IPv4 run-out has fairly
fundamental consequences for the environment in which we operate, and
at least one of the pillars of RFC2050 ("conservation") is not exactly
relevant anymore.

I consider RFC2050 a very useful document to establish principles, but it 
can not be binding - and in doubt, the bottom-up community based process
will win.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121011/1dd43b48/attachment.sig>