This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Tue Oct 9 12:58:25 CEST 2012
* Michiel Klaver > Removing the needs-based requirement would break open the entire IPv4 > market, letting big corporations to buy everything available and then decide > who they are willing to sell it for the highest price. > > IP addresses will become a tool to obstruct competitors, wipe-out all > smaller players and locking the market for newcomers. An authority > validating each request with the current policies could somewhat prevent > that from happening. You could say the same thing about real estate or pretty much any other freely traded resource in the world, and yet the sky isn't falling. In a competitive market, supply and demand will regulate the prices. Otherwise, there's plenty of laws governing cartels, monopolies, price fixing, anti-competitive practises, and so forth. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]