[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 14, Issue 4

Hi,

Myself Pooran Mittal, member of APNIC [IMCL-IN] with AS 17665.

How RIPE can help me to get IPV4 addresses.

Please help me.


Regards

Pooran Mittal

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net>
To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 3:30 PM
Subject: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 14, Issue 4


> Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to
> address-policy-wg at ripe.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Jan Zorz @ go6.si)
>   2. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Sander Steffann)
>   3. Re: [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and
>      simple re-using IP-addresses (James Blessing)
>   4. Re: Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8 (Richard Hartmann)
>   5. 2012-06 Draft Document and Impact Analysis will be produced
>      (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion) (Emilio Madaio)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:20:58 +0200
> From: "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan at go6.si>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <506C2DAA.3040509 at go6.si>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 10/3/12 1:41 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:55:53PM +0200, Marcin Kuczera wrote:
>>> I'am lost a little bit, what is the current status of policy, that would
>>> allow single /24 PI IPv4 assignment from the last /8 ???
>>
>> "Too controversial to go forward".
>
> It is a "yes" or "no" question, afaik :)
>
> Cheers, Jan
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:17:43 +0200
> From: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
> To: Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl>
> Cc: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID: <A3853826-7A62-4EE4-94D6-EBF1A6F5AE88 at steffann.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hello Marcin,
>
>> I'am lost a little bit, what is the current status of policy, that would 
>> allow single /24 PI IPv4 assignment from the last /8 ???
>
> You can find the status here: 
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-04
> The policy proposal is in the review phase and under discussion until the 
> 8th of October.
>
> Sander Steffann
> APWG co-chair
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 17:01:50 +0100
> From: James Blessing <james.blessing at despres.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684]
> Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
> To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID:
> <CAL5RSTKfm-c1O2k3q9jC01u_YK9-Az_7tfTW9DAFpzY04p9xVQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 3 October 2012 15:21, LeaderTelecom B.V. <info at leadertelecom.nl> wrote:
>> You can sub-allocate up to a /20 every twelve months to a single 
>> downstream
>> Internet Service Provider (ISP). The minimum sub-allocation size is a 
>> /24.
>> This is the smallest prefix length that can be reverse delegated and that
>> allows for a reasonable number of small assignments to be made by a
>> downstream network operator.
>
> Okay
>
> So wouldn't the best change be to allow up to allocation window per
> annum plus an ability to go via the RIPE NCC for further
> sub-allocations?
>
> J
> -- 
>
> James Blessing
> 07989 039 476
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 23:15:35 +0200
> From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
> To: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
> Cc: Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl>, address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID:
> <CAD77+gRkADX31OdFWdT_bt6kwPSo3ZyzNtvAbT-y=75E3Dbg1A at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I can't inline my replies on Android, sorry.
>
> The official status page is of limited use in this context, but the
> official date/timeline _is_ good to be reminded of; thanks.
>
> PS: I didn't attend and simply stole the 66 from Nick ;)
>
> Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121003/9263118a/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:24:42 +0200
> From: Emilio Madaio <emadaio at ripe.net>
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 Draft Document and Impact
> Analysis will be produced (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4
> depletion)
> To: policy-announce at ripe.net
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <mailman.2.1349344802.7774.address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The discussion period for the proposed change to RIPE Document
> ripe-553, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the
> RIPE NCC Service Region", has ended.
>
>
> A draft document and the RIPE NCC Impact Analysis will now be prepared
> for review. We will publish the documents shortly and we will make an
> announcement.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
>    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06
>
> Regards
>
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
>
> End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 14, Issue 4
> ************************************************