[address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Draft Document Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)

Dear Tore, all,

Thank you for the notification. The draft policy text has been
corrected.

The execution of the PDP is always improving. If the RIPE community has
input and ideas on the matter, like the ones recently expressed, please
do not hesitate to email <pdo at ripe.net>.

I'll gladly collect your feedback to take action upon it.

Best Regards
Emilio

On 11/26/12 10:27 PM, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Emilio Madaio
> 
>> The draft document for the proposal described in 2012-03, "Intra-RIR
>> Transfer Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact analysis
>> that was conducted for this proposal has also been published
>>
>> You can find the full proposa and the impact analysis at:
>>
>>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03
> 
> On this page, it would appear that the phrase «Within the RIPE NCC
> service region,» is to be added at the beginning of the second paragraph
> in section 5.5.
> 
>> and the draft document at:
>>
>>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03/draft
> 
> However, that phrase is not found in the «new text» box on this page.
> That must be an omission?
> 
> As a general feedback to the draft document page, not specific to
> 2012-03, I find it preferable if the «original text» and «new text»
> boxes are made as small as absolutely possible. If the paragraphs that
> aren't touched by the proposal are kept outside of those boxes, it is
> much easier to spot the actual changes made, than it is if you include
> the entire original and new section side-by-side (as is the case with
> 2012-03's draft document).
> 
> Taking it one step further, it would be even better if those paragraphs
> that have only change by a small amount (i.e., aren't completely
> rewritten) have the actual changes highlighted, e.g., using
> strikethrough for deleted text, and coloured text for added text (such
> as the "Within the RIPE NCC service region" added by this proposal).
> 
> The changes indicated in sections 6.0 and 6.3 at
> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-03/draft are two
> examples I like.
> 
> In any case, I support this policy proposal.
> 
> Best regards,
>