This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] openness in RIR policies
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] openness in RIR policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published(Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Nov 12 18:52:56 CET 2012
On 09/11/2012 15:03, Max Tulyev wrote: > The problem is that these "just numbers" became to have a real value, and this value grows fast. > This is a real life, whatever you want it or not. > If the policies will remain same as from time it has no values - it will lead to the dark crime market. I do not want this way to be real, but it becoming true now. > So we need to adjust policies with that real life situation. I support Sandra. > I don't think that anything Jim said contradicts you. Jim took issue with a couple of throwaway remarks: "Other RIR policies need to morph to support open-ness (sic)" "RIRs should not reclaim unused IP's (sic) now that they have value" neither of which she appeared to justify. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] openness in RIR policies
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published(Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]