This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110701002726] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110701002726] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published(Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Wed Nov 7 21:54:26 CET 2012
Dear Nick, Beautiful words. I respect your opinion. I think it is possible to find so great words about privacy. It is important to have balance between privacy and openness. My collegues from Greece told that they have very limited information in whois by privacy reason. In different countries is different opinion about privacy and opennes while we have different mentality. I don't see benefits for community in publishing list of transfer. -- Alexey 07.11.2012 21:24 - Nick Hilliard написал(а): On 07/11/2012 17:08, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > Put in Excel and make graph of transfers per month in count of IPs and > numbers of transfers? I think this information anyway will be published in > RIPE reports. I don't see other benefits. Cross-posting from from ietf at ietf.org earlier on today: > ‘Sunlight Is the Best Disinfectant’ > > ”Sunlight is the best disinfectant,” a well-known quote from U.S. Supreme > Court Justice Louis Brandeis, refers to the benefits of openness and > transparency. I invoke this quote often as executive director of the > NYSSCPA, to illustrate that the most credible and respected > organizations operate in an atmosphere of avowed openness. We should not > only accept criticism and suggestions, we should embrace them. If > questions from constituents, the public, or the media make leaders or > other responsible parties obfuscate, the questions are usually valid and > the answers are not. People who feel uncomfortable under the bright > light of scrutiny and criticism often have something to hide. ref: [1]http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2003/1203/nv/nv2.htm The same principal of openness and clarity have served the RIPE community extremely well since it began, and I see no reason abandon them at the point. Openness will help to ensure a fair and reasonable market. Nick [1] http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/2003/1203/nv/nv2.htm -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121108/247434b3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110701002726] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Addre [...]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published(Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]