This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Nov 7 21:40:59 CET 2012
On 2012-11-07 20:38, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 11/7/12 3:57 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> On 07/11/2012 14:32, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: >>> I think using PA space is good option for now. >> >> It's good if you're happy to build your business with sticky tape, >> chewing >> gum and string. > > Well, the big part of IETF was quite busy with standardizing "sticky > tape, chewing gum and string" for the last decade probably. > > I'm sure vendors will soon come out with new&shiny tools on their > equipment to easily get around this small issue. They are brilliant at > doing that (and of course charging for additional license somehow) :) > Oh yeah, tha't what I also feel. Vendors will find solutions to keep IPv4 forever... Recently I saw a lot of CarrierGrade NAT presentations on conference schedules... Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]