This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Nov 7 21:37:47 CET 2012
On 2012-11-07 20:35, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 11/7/12 8:25 PM, Marcin Kuczera wrote: >> Both - Cisco/Ericsson(RedBack) - for their BRASes have not yet >> implemented this access method for IPv6.. >> They have it on roadmap, but it will take a while for first releases and >> much more before they will be stable enough to >> put them in production. > > Not true. Cisco ASR1k and Ericsson Redback works very well with > IPv6/IPv4 for access. Tested at least for PPPoE/A users. Jan, please - read it once again, I wrote that - I don't care abut PPPoE/A, *NO PPP* I need NATIVE ETHERNET - in RedBack the call it CLIPS - any hints about that ? Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]