This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kuczera
marcin at leon.pl
Wed Nov 7 20:25:15 CET 2012
> By using IPv6. > > Unlike the landrush in the US we *do* have an alternative, and do not need > to find ways to make IPv4 last forever. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster Yeap... but... We are an ISP fucusing on individuals (most) and business (minority, but growing). Because of nature of our business, we decided to have central BRAS and large L2 (in future MPLS) network. So, most of our subscribers are connected via "ethernet all the way", native DHCP (no PPPoWhatever). Both - Cisco/Ericsson(RedBack) - for their BRASes have not yet implemented this access method for IPv6.. They have it on roadmap, but it will take a while for first releases and much more before they will be stable enough to put them in production. 2 years at least I suppose.. Now, imagine that there is a lot of ISPs like us with the same problem, however, very often lager scale... (I suppose that Juniper and others are at the same stage). Regards, Marcin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]