This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Nov 7 14:35:33 CET 2012
On 07/11/2012 12:58, Gert Doering wrote: > Anybody who relies on availability of "more IPv4 addresses" for their > future business planning is going to be quite unhappy. The same argument was made in the US in the late 1800s after the land rushes ended and the last bits of unassigned land were taken. After all, if there was no more land available, how could the economy survive and grow? But this isn't the point. The point is that there is a modest stash of resources available right now, and that PI requesters are being turned away. Down the road, everyone will be in the same boat: namely that if IPv4 addresses are needed, they will need to be acquired on the market. We're not there yet, though. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]