[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8

> > Why not continue give PA-addresses in this case? Many customers need them
too.
> Because you can't multihome PA addresses.

/24 PA works excelent for multihome. I have a lot examples.

> They can't rent them because the renting market has not yet developed, and
> they can't use ipv6 because it's not usable at the moment.

Just send me contacts and I'll help them. I mean IPv4 PA. It is not a problem
at all.
 
-- 
  Alexey Ivanov
 
07.11.2012 15:29 - Nick Hilliard написал(а):
 On 07/11/2012 10:38, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote:
> Why not continue give PA-addresses in this case? Many customers need them
too.

Because you can't multihome PA addresses.

> We have to be consistent:
> 1. Continue distribute last /8 for PA & PI.
> OR
> 2. Don't distribute last /8 for PA & PI (except LIR which didn't get 1024
> IPs from last /8).
>
> I think second option is more optimal, while some defficit and increasing
> prices for IPv4 allow customers run IPv6 faster.
>
> p.s. Who will PI-addresses? Why they can't rent them or start use IPv6?

They can't rent them because the renting market has not yet developed, and
they can't use ipv6 because it's not usable at the moment.

Nick
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121107/c56156f1/attachment.html>