This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Another small IPv6 allocation policy change proposal (sanity check email)...
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Another small IPv6 allocation policy change proposal (sanity check email)...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Another small IPv6 allocation policy change proposal (sanity check email)...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Nov 7 13:22:42 CET 2012
On 07/11/2012 11:53, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Is this something that nobody cares and should not be fixed? Is this a > threat to someone? Anyone sees any danger in going forward with this small > change? To give some background data on this, I figure this affects 55 LIRs out of 4587 which have ipv6 allocations. Of these, 44 LIRs have exactly 2 x 32. The distribution for the rest is: > /32 /32 /30 /27 > /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 > /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 /32 /30 Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Another small IPv6 allocation policy change proposal (sanity check email)...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Another small IPv6 allocation policy change proposal (sanity check email)...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]