This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Nov 7 12:29:07 CET 2012
On 07/11/2012 10:38, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote: > Why not continue give PA-addresses in this case? Many customers need them too. Because you can't multihome PA addresses. > We have to be consistent: > 1. Continue distribute last /8 for PA & PI. > OR > 2. Don't distribute last /8 for PA & PI (except LIR which didn't get 1024 > IPs from last /8). > > I think second option is more optimal, while some defficit and increasing > prices for IPv4 allow customers run IPv6 faster. > > p.s. Who will PI-addresses? Why they can't rent them or start use IPv6? They can't rent them because the renting market has not yet developed, and they can't use ipv6 because it's not usable at the moment. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]