This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Tue Nov 6 19:35:06 CET 2012
* Nick Hilliard > On 06/11/2012 16:32, Tore Anderson wrote: >> 2012-03[*] won't pass soon, and there is no guarantee that it ever will. >> Judging by the discussion it stirred up at the last RIPE meeting, I >> believe it has rather slim chances of reaching consensus. > > I don't think it's all doom and gloom, btw. True. I didn't mean to suggest that this propsal, if amended, could not reach consensus at some point in the future. My main message was that telling one's customers to sit around and wait for that to happen is really bad advice, unless it comes with a big fat warning that the waiting period may be very long, possibly even infinite. If the customer absolutely must acquire multihomable IPv4 address space, becoming an LIR is currently the only way that is certain to succeed in a reasonable time frame. That's what I tell my customers, anyway. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012110601002595] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]