This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Nov 6 17:48:40 CET 2012
On 06/11/2012 16:32, Tore Anderson wrote: > 2012-03[*] won't pass soon, and there is no guarantee that it ever will. > Judging by the discussion it stirred up at the last RIPE meeting, I > believe it has rather slim chances of reaching consensus. I don't think it's all doom and gloom, btw. The comments both on the mailing list and at the APWG session fell into a couple of different categories: - yes - no, but would support after 185.0.0.0/8 is exhausted - no, but would support if potential abuse could be reduced - no, under no circumstances What's clear is that there is no consensus on the current proposal. But I think that it may be possible to satisfy many of the concerns of the people who objected if the proposal were modified to e.g. reduce the possibility of potential abusers, or maybe make it applicable only to reclaimed address space and not 185.0.0.0/8. Nick [*] 2012-04
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]