[address-policy-wg] Status of /24 PI IPv4 from last /8

Nick,

I'm not sure that leaving the policy sit is a good idea
We already have customers asking for PI space and all we can tell them is
to wait.

Seeing the "Awaiting Decision from Working Group Chair" on the proposal
page, we hoped for a decision soon.
Should we advice them to become LIRs instead of waiting for a policy change?

George


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote:

> On 06/11/2012 10:20, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
> > *Sander Steffann*wrote<mailto:address-policy-wg%40ripe.net
> ?Subject=Re:%20%5Baddress-policy-wg%5D%20Status%20of%20/24%20PI%20IPv4%20from%20last%20/8&In-Reply-To=%3CA3853826-7A62-4EE4-94D6-EBF1A6F5AE88%
> 40steffann.nl%3E>/@
> > Wed Oct 3 15:17:43 CEST 2012/:
> >
> > Hello Marcin,
> >
> >> / I'am lost a little bit, what is the current status of policy, that
> >> would allow single /24 PI IPv4 assignment from the last /8 ???
> > /
> > You can find the status here:
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-04
> > The policy proposal is in the review phase and under discussion until
> the 8th of October.
> >
> > Sander Steffann
> > APWG co-chair
> >
> > I'm a little lost too. Are we waiting until RIPE66 or was there supposed
> to
> > be an update on that?
>
> Yannis,
>
> It was clear from the discussion at RIPE65 that there was no consensus in
> favour of the existing proposal.  As author of the proposal, I intend to
> leave the proposal sit for a short period (maybe a couple of months) before
> resuming work on it.  I think as a community, we need the benefit of some
> hindsight in terms of figuring out what's best in terms of overall policy.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121106/dc05c05c/attachment.html>