[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft and Impact Analysis Documents Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)

On 04/11/2012 09:03, Tore Anderson wrote:
> In light of that, it would seem that we do need to compel the NCC to
> publish the information after all. Hence, I do support 2012-05.
> 
> That said, if the NCC at a later point in the PDP starts publishing the
> information voluntarily, I withdraw my support of the proposal and
> instead object to it, on the grounds that it will be redundant and only
> serve to further bloat the policy text.

If the RIPE NCC feels that it's a matter of their interpretation as to
whether they publish this information or not, then there is a clear
requirement for having an explicit policy.

I support this policy.

Nick