This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Huston
gih at apnic.net
Fri May 25 06:24:45 CEST 2012
On 23/05/2012, at 11:12 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Tore Anderson > >> That is my understanding, at least. I asked this question to the RIR >> panel at the mic in Rome, whether and APNIC region ISP could (post >> APNIC depletion) set up a LIR in the RIPE region (or any other >> region), and allocate addresses from there and assign them to end >> users in their home region. The answer (which came from Geoff Huston >> IIRC) was something along the lines of «no, you have to assign the >> addresses in the service region from which they were allocated». > > Found it: http://ripe61.ripe.net/archives/video/18/ @ 22:03 > I think I said "we expect some alignment to these regions, but this is an expectation not a hard and fast rule", but I seem to have taken a few hundred words to do so! And I made some reference to human inventiveness that may be used to circumvent any such conventional expectations. :-) regards, Geoff
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Any-cast or uni-cast solutions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]