This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pascal Gloor
pascal.gloor at finecom.ch
Tue May 22 18:22:31 CEST 2012
>Probably all those CATV operators should be LIRs in the first place >anyway. They could, indeed. But as they have no knowledge of IP whatsoever and do not operate any IP device, it was always easier for them that we take care of this. Some did, but they are far from a majority. > Running your own infra with a sub-allocation (or even worse, an >assignment) from an LIR has it's risks, which you must take into account >when planning your business. That is not that case (at least for our customers), we own the infrastructure (Layer2 and above), we run it (for them), they don't. Pascal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]