This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pascal Gloor
pascal.gloor at finecom.ch
Tue May 22 16:18:15 CEST 2012
>Really, isn't CATV a closed access network that you have control off? >Could you do 6to4 (or something similar) at the border if you need to >access v4 content? Or have I misunderstood what you are doing? 6to4 is IPv6 tunnel over IPv4, not the other way around, what you mean is DNS46/NAT46 which is outdated, maybe 6rd or MAP46 (which is not yet really available). But that's not the point. My point is about post-v4-exhaustion policy, not about transition technologies, nor about lack of v4. It's about keeping the customer assigned v4 space (and not even the IPs, just the assignment size). Pascal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Assignment transfer among LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]