This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon May 21 10:57:59 CEST 2012
On 7 May 2012, at 16:58, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 5/7/12 4:27 PM, Sergey Myasoedov wrote: >> >> Regarding using last /8 for PI assignments, this proposal looks fair to me. > > Agree. Lets distribute the leftovers and be done with this for good, so people could focus on important things (such as IPv6 deployment :) ) +1 At the current run-rate, how long would PI from the final /8 be available ? Is it considered desirable by the community to any space whatsoever of the final /8 for PA, so that new LIRs can form and be given any v4 for a period of time longer than the anticipated run rate ? My mind is not made up on the subject yet, though I am erring on the side of 'no' because after some consideration, I think that v6 is the only long-term answer, and that stalling tactics are all very interesting to discuss. Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]