This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Wed May 9 15:57:06 CEST 2012
On 9 May 2012 14:29, <chrish at consol.net> wrote: > hi! > > On 05/09/2012 03:02 PM, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-02 > > this proposal doesn't fit with the current hierarchical structure of rirs and lirs. if this hierarchical structure is to be > changed, this would be an essential change. introducing such a change in just a subordinate procedure isn't the way to > go. > i can't see a justification or explanation why the rir/lir hierarchical structure should be changed. Hi, This policy only uses the existing to transfer policy for a transfer between two LIRs within a region to allow an Inter-regional transfer of addresses. If you have objects to the concept of transfers then you need to address the current transfer process rather than this extension. J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Policy Proposal (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Policy Proposal (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]