[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)

On 5/7/12 7:34 PM, Remco Van Mook wrote:
>
> <all hats off>
>
> Alright then, for the sake of argument I'll oppose until I see some
> convincing numbers. Back in the original last /8 discussion the rationale
> for choosing a /22 was that it would get us about 16k final allocations,
> or 1 for every NCC member and room for the membership to double in size.
> Now, we have a number of new realities:

So, when we hit the last /8 policy, all those who will then need IPv4 
space *must* become an LIR even if one /24 PI would fulfill entirely 
their need?

Not sure everyone appreciates that, specially not small companies or 
even start-ups :)

Cheers, Jan