This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey Myasoedov
sergey at devnull.ru
Mon May 7 20:16:33 CEST 2012
Hi Remco, how did you calculate 1/20? Do you mean 1/26? Okay, let's stop calculating. Actually 2007-01 does not conflict with 2012-04. Anyway, after depletion only price will be the difference between PI and PA. Monday, May 7, 2012, 7:34:25 PM, you wrote: RVM> Finally, I would like to hear how this proposal correlates to the charge RVM> for PI space - the good old 2007-01 chestnut. For post-depletion LIRs, the RVM> grapes would be quite sour if one could pick up a quarter of the available RVM> resources for about one twentieth of the price. Should "Final /8 PIv4" RVM> have a separate price tag? -- Sergey
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]