[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:52:41PM +0100, Turchanyi Geza wrote:
> I definitely declared that I still think that no concensus was reached.

Please re-read the mails you have sent.

We needed something very clear, like "no, we do not have consensus" or 
"yes, this is good enough for (rough) consensus" here.

You made very clear that you do not like the proposal, but that does not
automatically make it a statement of non-consensus - there was one e-mail
which very clearly stated:

  "I don't like the policy as I think its a bad idea [...], but [...] so it 
   seems that we are in fact at a consensus *but* [...]"

so "not liking the proposal but still thinking the WG has reached rough
consensus on it" is quite possible.

Since your mails didn't contain clear statements of consensus or not,
they have not been counted as either.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279