This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg
immo.ripe at be.free.de
Thu Jan 5 14:35:09 CET 2012
Gert wrote: > Looking at all the messages that have been posted in the discussions > following my e-mails, I categorize your feedback as follows: [...] > - statements of "we do not have consensus" > (Immo Wehrenberg, on the assumption that consensus has to be unanimous > Remco Van Mook) I'm afraid I have to correct you here. I said that I'm not sure wether we have consensous or not and i would follow Gezas opinion on that. Since Geza has not objected that consensous is reached, I assume that we have consensous now. Just a clarification, sorry that I did not make this clear in the first place. Immo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120105/11f4b4c7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]