This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
chrish at consol.net
chrish at consol.net
Tue Feb 28 13:37:05 CET 2012
hi! On 02/28/2012 01:13 PM, Gleb Katenin wrote: > request was turned down (see email below) due to the fact that initial > /32 has been already allocated to us. In reality, however, it was > allocated to another entity withing company which is not willing to though i believe internal administrative issues should not be solved by demands against community policies, i'm happy for you that the new policy might help you - even if it's just collateral. but actually, as i read your mail, i was wondering how much v4 address space is currently allocated to you (and by that i mean "all of you", no matter how your corporate group is assembled or how it's distributed among countries or RIRs)? regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]