[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:20:18PM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote:
> >> The problem is that the "additional allocation" policy is far more
> >> draconian than the "initial allocation" policy.
> >>
> >> HD ratio doesn't matter for the initial alloc, but for any
> >> additional alloc.
> >
> > What I read here is that probably we'll have to revise additional alloc 
> > policy part when we are done with 2011-04, am I right?
> 
> Yesterday. I see 2011-04 more as a vehicle to buy us three more bits to
> fix the additional allocation policy mess hopefully in time before folks
> need more than a /29, and that's why I don't oppose it. :-)

BTW, a proposal was recently brought forward in ARIN-land, trying to fix
similar IPv6 subsequent allocation policy mess:

http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2011-November/023758.html
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2012_2.html

(their criteria for another allocation is "75% or more of their total
address space, or more than 90% of any serving site" being utilized)

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0