This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2011-02: "Removal of Multihomed Requirement for IPv6 PI" Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Krogh (RKG)
Richard.Krogh at grontmij.dk
Wed Feb 22 14:27:57 CET 2012
Hi. Not shure if I am writing in the correct forum, but here goes: My company is recognized as an ISP, caused by our lease/reservation of RIPE based IP addresses. Question: Is it a ripe-demand that ISPs should have multihomed lines to their equipment or is single line OK? (beware that I am not talking of performance or the company's safety, only about what demands RIPE require). Thanks in advance. Richard Krogh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120222/95110b62/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2011-02: "Removal of Multihomed Requirement for IPv6 PI" Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]