[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)

On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:32 +0100, Michael Adams wrote:
> 5.1.2 says it's possible to qualify for an initial allocation greater
> than /29 based on the number of existing users.
> 
> Shouldn't this be possible for existing IPv6 space holders too?
> 5.7 doesn't mention this.

Existing IPv6 space holders can request (under the new policy) space to
get them to /29. Should they NEED more, based on their existing users,
they would probably qualify to request additional space. If they don't
qualify to request additional space, do they really NEED more?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120215/b02bf789/attachment.sig>