This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Sat Dec 15 00:20:51 CET 2012
On 14/12/2012 22:39, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Thanks for the comment (and for supporting the proposal). From what I > understand, the RIPE NCC has a procedure of defining a "month" calendar > months unless otherwise specified. It turns out that writing coherent english late on a friday evening is more than I'm capable of. Let's try again. >From what I understand, the RIPE NCC interprets "month" as meaning "calendar month" in RIPE policy documents - unless otherwise specified. There. That makes a little more sense, I think. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-09 New Policy Proposal (Modification of The Time Limits For Temporary Internet Assignments)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]