This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy forInter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) (Tore Anderson)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy forInter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) (Tore Anderson)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sandrabrown at ipv4marketgroup.com
sandrabrown at ipv4marketgroup.com
Mon Dec 3 15:03:47 CET 2012
3. Re: 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) (Tore Anderson) ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:57:07 +0100 From: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Message-ID: <50B9F093.9040700 at redpill-linpro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >From the Impact Analysis: > This policy proposal requires the RIPE NCC LIRs to be in compliance > with the RIPE NCC's policies. The RIPE NCC will conduct an audit to > ensure that this is the case prior to completing a transfer. I think that this is an excessively strict interpretation of the policy, one which I suspect isn't the intention of the proposer. In my opinion, an LIR should be assumed to be in compliance with the RIPE NCC's [sic] policies; the mere act of participating in an inter-RIR transfer should not cause an automatic LIR Audit. Mandatory LIR Audits would only serve to increase the amount of hassle and bureaucracy involved in completing such transfers, and might well discourage LIRs from participating in them at all. Given that this is the NCC's interpretation of 2012-02, I don't support the proposal as it is currently worded, and hope it could be modified so that it will not cause mandatory or automatic LIR Audits. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ Can someone explain more about what is involved in the audit? I was picturing more of a needs justification process where the applicant would illustrate that current IP's were 80% utilized. Is that the same as an audit? Also, Tore's last point on 2012-03 should be applied to the passing of 2012-02. In the event that 2012-03 is agreed to, and needs justification is extended from 3 months to 24 months, then 5.5 will have new wording to accommodate the change. Further, if 2012-02 is passed to allow for inter-RIR transfers to-from RIR's with like-policies, then Chapter 5.5 “Transfers of Allocations” of “IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region”; will require an additional wording change. Specifically, the second paragraph of 5.5 says: "...address space may only be re-allocated to another LIR that is also a member of the RIPE NCC. " and if Inter-RIR transfers are approved this will change to LIR's of another RIR. Sandra Brown President IPv4 Market Group sandrabrown at ipv4marketgroup.com 716-348-6768 www.ipv4marketgroup.com
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy for Inter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-02 New Draft Document Published (Policy forInter-RIR Transfers of IPv4 Address Space) (Tore Anderson)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]