This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Apr 25 15:28:59 CEST 2012
On 25/04/2012 14:21, Milton L Mueller wrote: > I note that another member of this list stated: "It's clear that there > is a problem here which needs to be fixed, and which balances both the > concerns of the ERX holders and the RIPE community (+ by extension, the > RIPE NCC)." While it would be nice to have a specific proposal on that, > until we discuss it and get a better grasp of the pros and cons of > different approaches, that is obviously premature. It is in progress - some of the ERX holders are discussing this on a mailing list. In the interim, there's not much point in creating proposals until the ERX holders have come up with some concrete ideas about what they're looking for. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv4 Maintenance Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]