This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] global coordination (was: 2012-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Sun Apr 15 18:15:08 CEST 2012
[spectrum regulation] > They have solved lots of the problems the RIRs are contemplating now. I'm not sure if it's instructive. There are a few odd things about spectrum allocations: There's no global uniqueness requirement. Not even the frequency ranges for the next-layer protocols are standardized globally. You have to throw away devices when the allocation changes (or at least disable the RF interface). With such possibilities at hand, the solution space is somewhat different.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] global coordination (was: 2012-01)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]