This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tero Toikkanen
Tero.Toikkanen at nebula.fi
Fri Apr 13 08:57:16 CEST 2012
> Any kind of transfer of unused space, should go back to the RIR and not end > up with the highest bidder. I agree. If we really feel we have the need to transfer IPv4 address space between RIRs, the transfers should happen between RIRs, not LIRs. I'm not so sure that is a good idea either... Also, we already have a policy for transferring address space within the RIPE-region. Why is this proposal trying to create a new policy instead of amending what we already have in place? Having drastically different rules for different kinds of transfers is confusing, resulting in something similar to IPv4 PI versus IPv6 PI. ____________________________________ Tero Toikkanen Nebula Oy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]