This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] In favor of 2012-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] a global policy on address transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] In favor of 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
James Blessing
james.blessing at despres.co.uk
Thu Apr 12 11:00:08 CEST 2012
On 11 April 2012 21:04, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote: > But after IPv4 exhaustion, common pool governance of v4 space breaks down completely and the best way to ensure > efficient utilization of remaining v4 resources is to allow market-based transfers. Why? Show a market where this is true... Surely the placing of a per unit value onto an item leads to a desire to acquire units where the scarcity of the that unit increases. Establishing an unfettered market is counter productive as the natural tendency is for those of wealth to acquire the resource and leads to governmental interference where there is a perceived "unfairness" in the distribution. I'm all for a inter-RIR transfer policy, just not this one J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] a global policy on address transfers
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] In favor of 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]