This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] In favor of 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Chris
chrish at consol.net
Thu Apr 12 10:21:12 CEST 2012
On 04/11/2012 10:04 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > The IP address space is not and never has been a commons. Not for those of us who actually understand the vocabulary of resource economics and know what the term "commons" means. > For IP addresses to be a "commons" they all would have to be available for use for anyone at any time; i.e., there would have to be no exclusive occupation of it. And of course that doesn't work technically, does it? IP address blocks have to be uniquely and exclusively assigned to specific users to function on the internet. Which means the address pool is not a commons - end of story. this is simply wrong. you do not know what you are talking about. i don't think there's more to say about it. maybe so much: i live in a place where commons have been a central and vital concept for society for hundreds of years, and following your frivolous statement it never could have existed. as an auxilliary measure i'd claim ownership of your ips. ah what the heck, 0/0 is mine. that's all so ridiculous - forgive me if i don't regard further discussion following this thread as sensible or worthwile. > Thus, I support proposed policy 2012-01, well then - bring it on to arin... ;) regards, Chris
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] In favor of 2012-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] declining 2012-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]