This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Last Call for Comments (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Last Call for Comments (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Last Call for Comments (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Wed Apr 11 17:27:24 CEST 2012
On 4/11/12 5:19 PM, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > There is a common rule, the HD ratio. It is in an RFC. Hi, Looks like we'll discuss HD ratio at Ljubljana meeting :) > As I mentionned, even 6RD coukld fit in the old allocation framework and > some people might invent even more need for addresses, if you allow > loosing the rules. Community decided they want to address the observed operational issue and at the same time don't want to make any technology "special". Why are we going in circles here? We've been through this 3 times already... :) Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Last Call for Comments (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 Last Call for Comments (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]