This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 18:14:08 CEST 2012
On Apr 4, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > > While I would strongly support the development of an inter-RIR transfer > policy (and/or cleanup of the current intra-RIR transfer policy), I don't > think this proposal is sufficiently clear and in line with other current > policy in the region to work. In other words, I oppose this proposal. > (just to be clear for the WG-chairs who are keeping count) > > What I would like to see instead is a simple framework, outlining the two > options: > > 1) transferring TO the RIPE NCC service region > 2) transferring FROM the RIPE NCC service region > > that clearly define which parts of the regular transfer policy would apply > to such a transaction. With that, we keep all the rules about transfers in > one place. > > 1) would be something like 'We welcome any address space transferred to > the RIPE NCC service region as long as transferring it is in line with > policies at the originating region and the entity receiving the space > qualifies as outlined in the policy for address transfers within the > service region' > > 2) would be something like 'You can transfer any address space to outside > the RIPE NCC service region as long as transferring it is in line with > policies at the receiving region and the address space qualifies for > transfer as outlined in the policy for address transfers within the > service region' > > Finally,if you then feel unhappy with the limitations in the current > transfer policy, I would very much like to invite anyone to introduce a > policy proposal to remove them. Well put. That is very much in line with what is being done in other regions (including ARIN and APNIC). -Scott > > > Best, > > Remco van Mook > Director of Interconnection, EMEA > > remco.vanmook at eu.equinix.com > +31 61 135 6365 MOB > > EQUINIX > 51-53 Great Marlborough Street > London, W1F 7JT, United Kingdom > > > > > > > On 02-04-12 15:39, "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for >> discussion. >> >> You can find the full proposal at: >> >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-01/ >> >> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to >> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 30 April 2012. >> >> Regards >> >> Marco Schmidt >> on behalf of the Policy Development Office >> RIPE NCC >> >> > > > > This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383. >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]