This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] [apwg-chairs] 2011-04 Decision to move to Last Call (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [apwg-chairs] 2011-04 Decision to move to Last Call (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [apwg-chairs] 2011-04 Decision to move to Last Call (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Apr 4 13:01:50 CEST 2012
On 03/04/2012 22:07, Gert Doering wrote: > If you disagree with our interpretation of what has been said, and the > conclusion we have drawn from it, please let us know. agree with interpretation. Looks good to me, although my concerns about the proposal still stand. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [apwg-chairs] 2011-04 Decision to move to Last Call (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [apwg-chairs] 2011-04 Decision to move to Last Call (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]