[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:42:31AM +0200, Chris wrote:

>also, policy clearly states its purpose to ensure 
>'consistent and fair' allocation 'to meet the needs',
>and that allocation is tied to usage/assignments.  

sure, but a minimum allocation may be larger than the 
sum of the assignments - that doesn't mean the NCC can
reclaim part of that allocation - or can it?

Of course if a policy were to pass that would enable 
this sort of fragmenting of allocations and the 
resulting de-aggregation via prefix trading, one 
might as well make a policy that required the return 
of unused allocation parts.

rgds,
Sascha Luck